Indonesian Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics is a peer-reviewed journal publishing high-quality computational and applied mathematics research. The journal covers areas including but not limited to:

• Mathematical Modeling and Simulation
• Computational Algorithms and Optimization
• Numerical Methods and Scientific Computing
• Machine Learning and AI in Mathematics
• Financial Mathematics and Quantitative Economics
• Data Science and Statistical Applications
• Mathematical-based Signal and Image Processing
• Computational Mechanics and Engineering Applications
• Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Editors ensure published content's integrity, quality, and relevance. Their responsibilities include:

• Managing the peer-review process fairly and efficiently.
• Ensuring all submissions align with the journal's scope.
• Upholding ethical standards in research and publication.
• Maintaining confidentiality in handling submitted manuscripts.
• Making unbiased editorial decisions based on reviewer recommendations and scientific merit.

• Initial Assessment: Editors evaluate submissions for relevance, originality, and adherence to journal guidelines before assigning reviewers.
• Peer Review: A minimum of two independent reviewers are assigned. Single-blind peer review is the standard process.
• Decision Making: Editors analyze reviewer feedback and make the following decisions: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
• Final Approval: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on the editors' recommendations.

Editors must enforce ethical guidelines, ensuring:

• No plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification of data.
• Proper conflict of interest disclosure by authors, reviewers, and editors.
• Ethical treatment of human and animal subjects (if applicable).
• Proper citation and acknowledgment of prior research.

• Select reviewers with relevant expertise and no conflicts of interest.
• Ensure timely and constructive peer review feedback.
• Maintain reviewer confidentiality.
• Acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of reviewers.

Editors should:

• Base decisions on academic merit and reviewer reports.
• Communicate decisions clearly and professionally to authors.
• Allow appeals if authors provide valid reasoning against a rejection.
• Encourage constructive feedback and improvements in submissions.

• Appeals must be reviewed carefully, considering additional reviewer opinions if necessary.
• Ethical complaints (e.g., misconduct, authorship disputes) should be addressed according to COPE guidelines.

• Maintain high standards in formatting, referencing, and clarity of accepted papers.
• Ensure timely publication of accepted articles.
• Promote open access and knowledge dissemination where applicable.

• Regularly contribute to journal development and improvement.
• Actively participate in editorial board meetings.
• Promote the journal in the scientific community.
• Identify and invite high-quality research contributions.

Editors should strive to:

• Improve the journal’s impact and indexing status.
• Encourage special issues on emerging topics.
• Foster collaboration between researchers and practitioners.